I believe it's A. <span>Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Unde current circumtances, 10-year term policy wouldn't guarantee thesafety of the kids because even after the policy ends, Eva's kids still haven't entered the age where they could find their own income (they would be 12, 13, and 15).
If Eva decided to add another 10 year despite the extra charge, The kids will be covered until they enter the productive age.</span>
Answer:
B'(- 2, 2 )
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the translation rule (x, y ) → (x + 3, y - 2 )
This means add 3 to the original x- coordinate and subtract 2 from the original y- coordinate, that is
B(- 5, 4 ) → B'(- 5 + 3, 4 - 2 ) → B'(- 2, 2 )
He makes it up by 1/3=.333%=$75*1.333=$99.98
he then discounts it by 20%=1/5=99.98/5=$19.99
If the original profit is $99.98-$75=$24.98
and then discounted by $19.99
it would be $24.98-$19.99
=
$4.99
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
![[-5+(-7)]^2-(7+3)^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B-5%2B%28-7%29%5D%5E2-%287%2B3%29%5E2)
Resolving Parenthesis
=> 44
