1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kipiarov [429]
3 years ago
12

ARGUMENT Write a dialogue between two people in Nebraska who are expressing their views on the issue of popular sovereignty. Hav

e one person defend the policy and the other oppose it.
History
1 answer:
andriy [413]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:PRO-Yes, this is a great idea...

OPPOSE- No people will make wrong decisions and then our economy will fall apart because people will get greedy.

PRO- You don't know that, let the people show what they got in store instead of accusing them right away.... That could happen, but people care about where they live.

OPPOSE-I am telling you letting people have a choice with the government you need just a few people with good heads to govern the area is a better than everyone.

PRO- But....

OPPOSE-But no.... Think of the classes. If you have rich people and poor people trying to get along deciding what is better than what it is just chaos waiting to happen.

PRO-You should give people a chance, I believe there is good in everyone and that poor or rich they can come to a decision together and we can govern ourselves and all live in harmony for centuries to come.

OPPOSE-Wake up to reality!!! There are stupid and bad and greedy people in the world not everything is good so you need to realize that not everyone is perfect and going to live up to that expectation.SO get over it...

You might be interested in
How do I connect napoleons impact to modern day?
svetlana [45]

Answer:

Napoleon has affected today's society in several ways. Napoleon developed something called the Napoleonic Code. This was a series of laws that brought a sense of order and fairness to France. ... Some of these ideas were represented in the French Revolution that also served as the model for revolutions in other countries.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
• had one central leader
ehidna [41]
To me it seems like a DICTATOR.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Explain the feudal system​
Delvig [45]

Answer:

The feudal system was a way of organising society into different groups based on their roles. It had the king at the top with all of the control, and the peasants at the bottom doing all of the work.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Subsistence farming is growing cash crops on a farm in order to sell and make money true or false
ZanzabumX [31]
This is false. Subsistence farming is <em>only</em> <em />for ones single use, and not for trade.

I hope this helps you! Good luck :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is consumer sovereignty?
    14·2 answers
  • A. What did the G.I. Bill do? How did it affect American families after WWII? (15 points)
    10·1 answer
  • The Vietnam war is an example of war that the US fought and lost during the Cold War.
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways did the colonial governments established democratic institutions
    15·1 answer
  • HELP
    14·2 answers
  • What did the Lieutenant Governor raise the Indian people’s rent for
    7·1 answer
  • Who were the aggressors of the Holocaust ? And who were the Aggressors of the Armenian Genocide ?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the northwest ordinance of 1787
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a factor in causing the Cold War after World War II?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did Napoleon sell the Louisiana territory to the US?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!