1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveticcg [70]
3 years ago
12

According to massachusetts governor john winthrop's speech to the massachusetts general court in 1645, moral liberty:

History
1 answer:
hichkok12 [17]3 years ago
3 0
C <span>replaced the need for authority.</span>
You might be interested in
Which most accurately describes the arab empire's impact on religion in the middle east?
Trava [24]
The Arab empire converted and unified pagan societies to Islam
4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE PICK FROM A OR B ONLY PICK ONE!!!!!!!
sukhopar [10]

The correct answer is A) Canada and Latin American nations secured economic independence from the start.

One similarity shared by Latin American nations and Canada during their independence movements was that Canada and Latin American nations secured economic independence from the start.

Canada and Latin American countries that got their independence did not depended economically form their former European monarchies. Canada got its independence from Great Britain on July 1, 1867. In that time it was recognized as the autonomous Dominion of Canada, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and the provinces of Quebec and Ontario. In the case of Latin American countries such as Mexico, it gained its independence from the monarchy of Spain on September 27, 1821, with the Treaties of Cordova.

6 0
3 years ago
By making reforms in the 1980s, mexico was able to ________.
RideAnS [48]
Reduce its nation's debt
8 0
3 years ago
What roles did great Britain's colonies play in causing that Industrial Revolution
Margaret [11]
The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons

1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with

the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.

Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
5 0
3 years ago
Mark three ways the attitudes of the United States changed after World War I. It lost interest in progressive causes. It had mor
Liono4ka [1.6K]

<u>Options A, C, E.</u>

<u>Here is why:</u>

It lost interest in progressive causes.

Before and during World War I, many people who were progressive supported the war. Woodrow Wilson, who was the president of the United States at the time, made it seem like World War I was the "war of all wars" and it would end violence around the world. This seems very contradicting, but progressives believed in what he was saying along with other citizens. All of this caused progressivism to fall after World War I, as people started to realize the cruelty and death that happened during the war and associated being progressive with wanting war.

~

It wanted to return to a normal lifestyle.

After World War I was over, many American citizens just wanted to return to a normal lifestyle. World War I came with many casualties, hardships, and cost the United States a lot of money. Many people were tired and wanted to return back to normal and wanted to avoid another huge conflict. This caused the debate if whether or not the United States should back away from foreign affairs and even try to ignore them.

~

It was very concerned with the question of isolationism or internationalism.

Although some people in the United States wanted to back away from foreign affairs, isolationism and internationalism was always a question. Isolationism is the act of ignoring and not getting involved in foreign affairs and wars, even if a friendly foreign country needed help. Some people wanted this, as they didn't want anymore American casualties and debt and wanted to always remain in a normal and comfortable lifestyle. Internationalism is the exact opposite and is the act of getting involved in everything important in outside affairs and occurrences. Many people argued that this was correct, as it was important that America evolved with the country to exert and bring peace and prevent wrong doings, harmful ideologies and some countries from becoming too powerful.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 20 POINTS
    8·2 answers
  • HELP ASAPPPP
    11·1 answer
  • When castro split with the united states in 1961, cuba became the ally of _______?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the state with smaller populations support the New Jersey Plan?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Give me 5 sentences about her life, her cause, and her impact.
    13·1 answer
  • What theory did hitler emphasize in Mein Kampf
    9·1 answer
  • When choosing images for a presentation, make sure they
    11·2 answers
  • One of the original purposes of the Bill of Rights was to restrict the power of government over the lives of individuals.
    11·2 answers
  • Which of these statements is true?
    14·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!