Answer: Decision Making by consumers.
Explanation:
When a decision is made by a consumers, this decisions sets in place a chain of reactions that change their lives, the lives of those around them ( this includes their immediate family and community at large). and the lives of people they haven’t even met before. What this single decision does is that it sets in motion a chain of reactions.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
Resistance (i.e., war and military resistance); sometimes this included attempts to draw upon supernatural solutions to avoid or to undo conquest.
Acquiescence—often this meant trying to negotiate the best terms possible;
Alliance—sometimes it was possible to join with the Europeans in conquest of neighbours (often traditional enemies with whom they had long been in conflict anyway).
Explanation:
(I gave three)
He is using the "Labeling" aspect of the categorization part of the perception process.
Labelling is portraying somebody or something in a word or short phrase.[1] For instance, depicting somebody who has infringed upon a law as a criminal. Labelling hypothesis is a hypothesis in human science which credits marking of individuals to control and distinguishing proof of degenerate conduct. It has been contended that labelling is fundamental for communication. However, the utilization of the term is frequently proposed to feature the way that the name is a depiction connected all things considered, as opposed to something characteristic for the named thing.
Based on historical context, the statement about anthropologists studying sexuality as features of anthropology before World War II are the following:
- Human sexuality was considered to be a fundamental aspect of the culture and was included in various customs.
- Anthropologists like Margaret Mead researched sexuality among young people in the western Pacific.
However, the statement about Anthropologists studying sexuality as a feature of anthropology after World War II is the following:
- Anthropologists no longer focused on sexuality customs that centers on marriage, relatives, and family.
- Anthropologists started researching sexuality issues such as gay, lesbian, and queer life, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that anthropologists studied different characteristics of sexuality before and after World War II.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1799013
