Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
$19
Explanation:
The computation of the financial advantage or disadvantage is shown below:
= Sale value after processed further - cost of processed further - sale value without processed further
= $91 - $29 - $43
= $19
Simply we deducted the cost of processed further and the sale value without processed further from the Sale value after processed further so that the correct amount can come
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
There are several ways you can find a record. The easiest way is by using the find command. You can do this by pressing the combination keys Control + F. You will then see a mini search box in the top right corner of your screen. Lastly, type in the word, phrase, or record that you want to find. You will then be directed to several highlighted words, and TADA! :D
Hope this helps :)
Answer:Telling style leadership
Explanation: According to Hersey and Blanchard’s situational model of leadership, The telling style is an authoritarian type of leadership ususally directed or used with low- maturity followers where the leader gives explicit directions and instructions on how tasks should be performed and orders are not subject to interpretation
This type of leadership usually occurs when the leader has an expertise in the area which he or she specializes and so gives clear, precise quick and controlled instructions for efficient implementation.
Here, Sandra uses the Telling style leadership to accomplish tasks and performances.
Answer:
Focused differentiation strategy
Explanation:
A focused differentiation strategy is used by organizations that concentrate on having products that have a unique feature that fulfills the needs of a specific target market that is willing to pay more for these products. According to this, the answer is that in this scenario, Organic Eats is following a focused differentiation strategy.
