Answer:
Year Cash Flow (A) Cash Flow (B)
0 -37,500 -37,500
1 17,300 5,700
2 16,200 12,900
3 13,800 16,300
4 7,600 27,500
1) Using an excel spreadsheet and the IRR function:
IRR project A = 20%
IRR project B = 19%
2) Using the IRR decision rule, Bruin should choose project A.
3) In this case, since the length of the projects is only 4 years, then there should be no problem with the IRR decision rule, but for projects with longer time lengths, the discounts rates might vary and the best option is to use the modified internal rate of return (MIRR). But in this case the NPV of project B is higher, then Bruin should probably project B because it has a higher NPV. The NPV is always more important then the IRR.
4) Again using an excel spreadsheet and the NPV function:
NPV project A = $6,331
NPV project B = $8,139
5) first we must subtract cash flows from A by the cash flows from B:
1 $11,600
2 $3,300
3 -$2,500
4 -$19,900
then we calculate the IRR = 16%
Bruin should be indifferent between the two projects at a 16% discount rate. That means that at discount rates above 16%, you should choose project A, but at discount rates below 16%, you should choose project B
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
At the growth rate of 3% per year
Number of years taken to double the GDP = 23.33 years
The the GDP will double ( 23.33 - 20 ) 3.33 years earlier at 3.5% growth rate
Explanation:
According to the rule of 70
Number of years taken to double the GDP = 70 ÷ [ Growth rate ]
Thus,
At the growth rate of 3% per year
Number of years taken to double the GDP = 70 ÷ 3
= 23.33 years
Further
if the growth rate is 3.5% per year
Number of years taken to double the GDP = 70 ÷ 3.5
= 20 years
Hence,
The the GDP will double ( 23.33 - 20 ) 3.33 years earlier at 3.5% growth rate
Answer:
Capitalism is an economic system based on investing money in the expectation of making a profit. The means of production are usually privately owned by private entrepreneurs who often use wage labor to create added value. In doing so, they enjoy a great deal of legal freedom to dispose of these means, free enterprise production. This freedom also means that there is competition, which means that entrepreneurs have an interest in increasing the efficiency of their company. Hence, the capital owner will not fully consume the profit but reinvest in the business and capital accumulation takes place. The distribution of products is regulated by the market, in which the role of the government is, in principle, limited to that of market master.
Answer:
re 17.4600%
Explanation:
We will calculate using the Modigliani Miller proposition with no taxes to solve for the cost of equity of a levered firm
We plus our values into the formula and solve
re 17.4600%
