I think the answer your looking for is
Love, Romance, Heartbreak and hound dogs.
Hopefully this helped.!
Two statements which show some American objection to the 2000 Presidential election were:
- 1. The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.
- 5. George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.
<h3>What happened in the 2000 Presidential election?</h3>
George Bush was able to beat Al Gore even though he lost the popular vote because he won at the Electoral College.
This caused consternation amongst Americans as well as the ruling by the Supreme Court on the Florida recount appearing to be partisan - in favor of a party.
Find out more on the 2000 Presidential election at brainly.com/question/556024.
First, we must note the difference. The federal system used under the USA allows the government to be branched, so that each area of the land is allowed to focus on their own problems, with a general government to help enforce, supply, and be the 'parent' of the smaller governments. In this way, it eases the tasks needed for a central government, which in turn can focus on national interest and over-sea policies. This type of government also has three branches, and with the passage of the checks-and-balances, allows the three to share equal power and to make sure that none of the branches become to powerful (in becoming a unitary government).
In a unitary system, however, the central government (national) is the only power and only gives its power to those they wish to have. The country is only governed by one branch, the executive branch, which also incorporates all other branches together too. However, there are many sub-branches, but they do not have the same rights (as they do not have checks-and-balances, as in the federal system). These rights are given by the central government, who has the final say in all things.
hope this helps
Because Spain is stupid of course
