Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
Answer:
Option B - There are significant diseconomies of scope is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Option A is, not a condition that could improve the probability that the justice department would approve the merger.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman index is based on a restricted definition of the product market or the impact of foreign competition, the merger might be allowed.
It might also be permitted if one of the firms is in financial trouble, or if significant economies of scale exist in the industry.
Significant diseconomies of scope would only serve to make the merger less likely to be accepted.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
Red bull engaging in sponsorship shows they are utilizing the well packaged Red bull's marketing budget. But there should be some level of caution in either co- sponsoring or being the sole sponsor for certain sports, especially sports with high risk or danger. While sponsoring stunts like Bull stratos is a good way to make high publicity for their brand (Red bull) but if something bad happens in the course of the stunts, the brand could be connected to the tragedy which would be an everlasting bad label on the company. The company might be seen as insensitive for sponsoring such a sport that involves high risk.
Red bull sponsors X-treme sports and as a results of this sponsorship their brand have enjoyed having more time of product exposure and placement because the sponsorship will give the brand more attention with the consumers.
While it is good they go on with their various sponsorships, they must also be careful on some sports or events that involves high risk.
Answer: The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
Business behavior will not determine the ethics of society. Businesses can't be responsible to change the moral and ethical behaviors of a single person or an entire world. Only a person can change their own behavior. A society in whole can only be changed by each person acting upon their own free will.
If a business is not ethical, then they need to change the way they work and do business and lead by example.
