Answer:
Entries are given below
Explanation:
Calculations
Cash = ($68,000 x 90%) - ($68,000 x 2%)
Cash = $61,200 - $1,360
Cash = $59,840
Loss on sale = ($68,000 + $3,800) - ($59,840 +$5,800)
Loss on sale = $71,800 - $65,640
Loss on sale = $6,160
Entries
DEBIT CREDIT
Cash $59,840
Loss on sale $6,160
Receivable from factor $5,800
Recourse liability $3,800
Receivables $68,000
PLATO ANSWER: Alternative Goods
Hope this helps! I got it correct also so I know its correct!
The answer would be that there are few other places to purchase soda on campus; competition (or lack thereof) can play a big factor in determining price elasticity.
While nutrition information can shift consumers' preferences, we have no indication within the question of whether or not the students are well-informed of the impact of their drinking choices.
As for the third option, we are not given any information on the students' budgets, and no information with which to infer this, either. We only have information on their spending as it is related to soda, not as compared to other purchases.
Finally, given that the quantity sold does not change much despite the change in price, we can conclude that this price curve is relatively inelastic, in which case the price elasticity of demand would be closer to zero than one. This effectively rules out the last answer.
Answer:
a. according to the agreement.
Explanation:
Profits or losses, made by a partnership firm shall be divided among its partners in accordance with terms specified in the agreement.
However, in absence of any written or oral agreement among the partners, profits and losses shall be distributed equally among the partners.
Answer:
Hi
The insurance company should not pay as it is explained that the insurance policy did not cover against vandalism or theft, and a fire is the product of an act of vandalism.
Explanation:
To avoid this type of problem, there are the multi-risk policies of the home, which offer coverage for damages due to vandalism, to cover the damages caused by malicious intent by third parties. This coverage usually includes damages caused by people other than the policyholder, their relatives, employees or people living in the insured home. Some insurers include damages caused by tumultuarial actions in activities of meetings or demonstrations, as well as the existence of legal strikes, unless the aforementioned actions had the character of a mutiny or popular uproar. But we must consider that not all vandalism situations are covered by insurance, and situations such as graffiti, inscriptions, graffiti drawings are usually not covered, but depend on each specific policy.