Answer:
Option C Prohibited movies from depicting nudity, long kisses, and adultery.
Explanation:
The Motion Picture Production Code was set by Will H. Hays, who says that the Hollywood must secure its image by presenting movies that must not contain contents that includes nudity, long kisses and adultery contents. This code would make the movies a choice for every family to watch in gatherings and would uplift the moral stance of Hollywood.
Answer: The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it.
Explanation:
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
<u>Answer:
</u>
It is a crime and PC 470 and PC 473 are the Penal Code Sections that address this crime.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Any individual who chooses to do a signature in someone else's name on a document that can be deemed as legal in the court of law is committing a crime that is punishable as it is a civil offense.
- Greg's action of signing the document by himself in someone else's name simply because he had acquired an oral consent of the other person is considered by law as a crime under Penal Code 470 and Penal code 473.
Answer:
I don't know I am soooo sorry.... I was here for the points... :(
Explanation:
I hope you understand.....
