Answer:
a therapist must break the obligation of confidentiality if there is a clear danger to a specific identifiable person.
Explanation:
As per the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University, the court decides that in case a patient of a therapist poses serious danger to a person, he incurs an obligation to take appropriate care to protect the intended victim from such threat. In this case, the therapist failed to protect the victim who was killed by his patient. He was even failed to convey the patient's intention to victim. Victim's parents sued the therapist and University staff for not exercising their duty to alert the victim of the patient's threat.
Answer: War Hawks
Explanation: Known as the “War Hawks,” they were mostly young politicians from hailing from the West and South. Led by new Speaker of the House Henry Clay, this small group of Jeffersonian Republicans pressed for a military confrontation to redress American grievances.
<span>The concept of warrant in logic refers to "the evidence that supports one's claims".
</span>Evidence is likewise alluded to as help or certainties. Evidence is only that: certainties. Not at all like cases, realities are undeniable. You may have heard the excess expression "true facts." The expression is repetitive on the grounds that all realities are valid: that is the thing that makes them actualities. Evidence is the thing that you use in enticing composition to help the cases that you exhibit. Hope this helps!
Answer:
nife crime. Knife crime is crime involving a knife. It's a crime to threaten someone with a knife or carry a knife as a weapon in a robbery or burglary. Police can search you if they think you're carrying a knife. Some knives are offensive weapons and are banned in public places.
Explanation:
I think it was china or england. hope to help.
