All categories

4 years ago

You plan to construct a restaurant on a 20,000 square foot lot

Business

1 answer:

labwork [276]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

8,000 square foot

Explanation:

Total space available 20,000 square foot.

60 percent to be used. space left?

If 60% is will be used, only 40% will be availble for construction.

40% of 20,000= 40/100x 20,000

=0.4 x 20,000

=8,000 square foot

You might be interested in

As the volume of financing increases, the costs of the various types of financing will ________, ________ the firm's weighted av

charle [14.2K]

As the volume of financing increases, the costs of the various types of financing will increase, raising the firms weighted average cost capital. This happens because the firm will have to pay more in fees for their financing an that will be passed on to the firms weighted average cost capital.

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose that because of a sudden increase in life expectancy, a lot of people decide to save more for what they expect to be a l

DanielleElmas [232]

Answer: d. shift the supply of loanable funds to the right causing the interest rate to fall.

Explanation:

Loanable funds come from the deposits(savings) that people make in financial institutions like banks. If more people were to make deposits, the amount of savings in the system would therefore increase.

To illustrate this increase the supply for loanable funds curve will shift to the right which will cause the interest rates to fall as there is now more supply relative to demand.

4 0

3 years ago

n an attempt to have funds for a down payment in five years, James Dupont plans to save $3,800 a year for the next five years. W

Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

$20,582.03

Explanation:

For this question, we have to determine the future value that is shown on the attachment. Kindly find it below:

Data provided in the question

NPER = 5 years

PMT = $3,800

Rate of interest = 4%

PV = $0

The formula is shown below:

= -FV(Rate;NPER;PMT;PV;type)

So, after solving this, the future value is $20,582.03

6 0

3 years ago

Economists believe that there are more efficient ways to deal with pollution than with environmental standards because these sta

liberstina [14]

Answer:

B. allow reductions in pollution to be achieved at minimum cost.

Explanation:

Environmental standardization - development and establishment of a set of mandatory rules, requirements, norms and norms in the field of use of natural resources, protection of the environment from pollution and other harmful influences, ensuring ecological safety, aimed at improving their environmental characteristics and implementation of system-wide identification for establishment conformity and certification.The subject of standardization - technical legislation and regulatory documents regulating the processes, methods, methods, rules of human life. However, the economists think that these standards are not enough and have some problems. Based on social and economical analyzes, they proved that these regulations can not control polluter's emissions directly and then there will be the appearance new methods which are more effective than these. The biggest problem with environmental standards is : these standards are not flexible and they do not allow to fulfill the reduction in pollution by achieving at minimal cost.

8 0

3 years ago

Assume the following information for a company that produced 10,000 units and sold 9,000 units during its first year of operatio

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

Absorption costing income is $29,500 higher than variable costing.

Explanation:

The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable. The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.

The variable costing method incorporates all variable production costs (direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead).

Absorption costing:

Unitary production cost= (80 + 50 + 10) + (295,000 / 10,000)= $169.5

Sales= 9,000*200= 1,800,000

COGS= 9,000*169.5= (1,525,500)

Gross profit= 274,500

Sales expense= (9,000*8)= (72,000)

Net income= $202,500

Variable costing:

Unitary production cost= 140

Sales= 1,800,000

Total variable cost= (140 + 8)*9,000= (1,332,000)

Total contribution margin= 468,000

Fixed manufacturing overhead= (295,000)

Net operating income= $173,000

Difference= 202,500 - 173,000= $29,500

Absorption costing income is $29,500 higher than variable costing.

4 0

3 years ago