Answer:
resources like land, tools, money, time, labor and enterprise
Answer:
The answer to this question is (c) Labour, Labour intensive
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory that proposes that countries export what they can most efficiently and plentifully produce.
The model emphasizes the export of goods requiring factors of production that a country has in abundance. It also emphasizes the import of goods that a nation cannot produce as efficiently. It takes the position that countries should ideally export materials and resources of which they have an excess, while proportionately importing those resources they need.
Therefore in regard to the question above,
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Hence the answer is the third option, Labour, Labour intensive
Answer:
Emergency fund.
Explanation:
Emergency funds are money that we keep on hand in case of unforeseen events. It may cover car repairs, unforeseen buying, medical bills and so on.
It is important to hold some emergency funds so as to avoid being stranded with no access touch needed resources.
Also emergency funds can be saved over time in case of job loss, having some back-up funds to use in the meantime will be a wise strategy.
Hey there!
<span>Which of the following is NOT one of the mentioned ways high school differs from higher learning?
Answer: </span>
<span>Amount of support and guidance
Hope this helps
Have a great day (:
</span>
Answer:
A. that my answers
Explanation:
Jones and smith share the same cuvical in the officce. Jones loves to listen to music on his speakers while working. Smith is not able to concentrate on his work in the presence of music. Jones recieves benefits worth $200 regardless of whether he listen to music on his speakers or headphones. The cost of headphones is $50. SMith is not abke to conecentrate on his work and suffers damages worth $350 when Jones listens to music without his headphones. Smith does not suffer any damages when Jones listens to music on his headphones.
Suppose the office does not have any rules against listening to music on speakers while working. In thisâ case, if Jones and Smith do notâ communicate, the market outcome is that:
a. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is not able to concentrate on his work
b. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; however, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
c. Jones starts listening to music on headphones; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
d. Jones stops listening to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
