A researcher took a random sample of 100 students from a large university. She computed a 95% confidence interval to estimate th
1 answer:
Answer:
Part (A): The correct option is true.
Part (B): The null and alternative hypothesis should be:
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider the provided information.
Part (A)
A random sample of 100 students from a large university.
Increasing the sample size decreases the confidence intervals, as it increases the standard error.
If the researcher increase the sample size to 150 which is greater than 100 that will decrease the confidence intervals or the researcher could produce a narrower confidence interval.
Hence, the correct option is true.
Part (B)
The researcher wants to identify that whether there is any significant difference between the measurement of the blood pressure.
Therefore, the null and alternative hypothesis should be:
You might be interested in
Let , so that
Then the integral transforms to
Integrate by parts, taking
For 0 < y < 1, we have |1 - y²| = 1 - y², so
It's easy to show that uv approaches 0 as y approaches either 0 or 1, so we just have
Recall the Taylor series for ln(1 + y),
Replacing y with -y² gives the Taylor series
and replacing ln(1 - y²) in the integral with its series representation gives
Interchanging the integral and sum (see Fubini's theorem) gives
Compute the integral:
and we recognize the famous sum (see Basel's problem),
So, the value of our integral is
There go your answer to your question
