There are many different people who have power. Therefore, there isn't one person who has all the power. Also, a system of checks and balances helps make sure that nobody takes more power than what is given to them.
I think the main issue was not to approve <span>Emancipation Proclamation, which made all the slaves in the south were free. I'm not sure about this answer </span>
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
<span>In order to know if a country is in its golden age, you need to know about its future, specifically whether or not it will perform worse than it currently does. Cuz nobody can tell for sure about the future</span>
10%= Just drop out brother
