1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inn [45]
3 years ago
7

What did the English merchants use to buy slaves in Africa as part of the triangular trade?

History
2 answers:
Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago
8 0

I really beleive the answer is D. Sugar!

trapecia [35]3 years ago
5 0

the answer is B: rum. just got it right on plato.

You might be interested in
What did the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution refer to? A. reserved powers B. the right to bear arms C. women’s right to vote
FrozenT [24]

A. Reserved powers.

The tenth amendment is meant to emphasize the limited powers of the federal government.

The tenth amendment says this “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

I hope this helps u!

Good luck! :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Enlightenment lead to the French Revolution
just olya [345]

D-  they believed in divide rights

4 0
3 years ago
What are the differences in how Americans and Brazilians construct their cultural taxonomy of race (classifications of a person'
vichka [17]

Answer:

Explanation:  The difference is found in the following aspects: Americans have their cultural taxonomy based on 6 groups that make up the ethnography of that country. They are: Whites, blacks, Native Americans, Asians, Hawaiians and those who are made up of two races, that is, the so-called multiracial. The Brazilian ethnography is also composed of 6 types of races, which are: White, black, brown, yellow, indigenous and race without any statement. It is at this point that the difference in racial taxonomy between these two countries is found.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the driving force for settling in the Southern Colonies
GaryK [48]

Explanation:

By the end of the seventeenth century, the Chesapeake area and the southern colonies, with their enormous rice plantations, developed an economic system wholly dependent on slavery.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What conclusion does this Christian-themed crown from medieval Ethiopia support? A photograph features an Ethiopian crown decora
    5·1 answer
  • The men at the Continental Congress made plans to: A: retreat B: begin peace talks C: strengthen the soldiers D: go to England a
    5·1 answer
  • Who was first known host of the alien symbiote Venom?
    13·2 answers
  • When and where did Hernando de soto's exploration career begin?
    11·1 answer
  • The neutrality acts of 1930s were intended to achieve what outcome
    6·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Magna Carta
    14·2 answers
  • Which institution became stronger and limited the monarchy in order to end absolutism in England
    10·1 answer
  • How did railroads affect western settlement in the late 1800s?
    6·2 answers
  • What did the United States have that made it so successful during the second industrial revolution include as many factors as yo
    5·1 answer
  • 2 most important committees in house
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!