What is this? i’m not sure what i’m looking at
Answer:
a; circuit-switched network.
b; No, it does not need congestion control.
Explanation:
For A;
A circuit-switched network is a better option for this application. This is because of the fact that the application is made up of long sessions with smooth data transfer capacity needs.
The transmission rate is known, and does not transmit in short intervals(short signals), every application session can have a bandwidth reserved without significant bandwidth wastage.
Also, the overhead expenses of setting up and tearing down connections are canceled out over the extensive period of running an application session.
For B;
If the packet-switched network is used, and traffic in the network comes from the said application. Even if every applications transmit one or more network connections. Still, we already know that every connection has enough transmission capacity to handle majority of the application data rates, no congestion(insignificant queuing) will happen.
This goes to say that no congestion control will be needed given such broad-based connection.
Answer:
double the bandwidth assigned per channel to 40 MHz
Explanation:
The best way of doing this would be to double the bandwidth assigned per channel to 40 MHz. This will make sure that the capacity is more than sufficient. This is simply because the bandwidth of a channel represents how much information can pass through the channel at any given second, the larger the channel, the more information/data that can pass at the same time. Therefore, if 20 MHz is enough for the network, then doubling this bandwidth channel size would be more than sufficient capacity for the network to handle all of the data.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Analytical processing uses multi-levelaggregates, instead of record level access.