<span>Rachel is already on her way to work, in this case she will write the note to herself and store it in her pocket. When she returns home she will then proceed to paste the note on her door preventing her from forgetting it tomorrow.</span>
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
Part A: In part a, we are required to show the effects on the financial statements using horizontal statements model.
For that, we need to tabulate the entries properly. So, it cannot be done be done here in the typing section. So, I m putting it into the attachments. Please refer to the attachment for the part a solution.
Part B:
Reason of the difference:
Cash revenue is $8650 but cash flow amount is $9600
Total operating expense incurred is $3350 but the amount paid only $2700
It will create $650 difference income statement and cash flow.
These activities are reasons for the differences between cash flow from the operating activity and net income.
Answer:
A. human resources management intervention
Explanation:
Human resources interventions are oriented in the way of managing people in the more effective an efficient way. The typical responsibilities of human resources are of handling recruiting, hiring, performance, compensation, benefits, and career development.
Answer:
D. Corn is not used in the production of other goods.
Explanation:
D is the only option that can be an argument for the total value of the corn produced to be included as corn for the same year in the GDP.
This is due to the fact that only the final production is recorded in the GDP, this means that no goods are registered that are going to be part of other productive processes (generally raw materials) since double accounting would be incurred.
If for example, corn were part of another productive process and this productive process begins next year, that part of the corn used to produce that good would be included in the GDP of the year in which the product will be produced (the one that corn is used in the production).
This means that the lobbyist can only rely on option D (include all the value of corn for the year in which it was produced) if in this country the corn is not part of another productive process.
The gross value of qualifying property left to the surviving spouse is included in the marital deduction. This is not a requirement of the unlimited marital deduction.
Hence, option D is the correct answer.
Unlimited marital deduction is a clause that enables a person to give their spouse limitless property at any time. This clause belongs to the federal estate of the United States. No limitation on the transfer of property is imposed.
There is no requirement for the gross value of the property that is kept for the surviving spouse under the unlimited marital deduction.
Option a is wrong because a husband and wife must be married in order to qualify for the unlimited marital deduction, this choice is incorrect.
Option b is improper since the property should be passed to the spouse through real estate under unlimited marital deductions.
Option c is erroneous because, in order to qualify for the unlimited marital deduction, the surviving spouse must be a citizen of the United States.
To know more about unlimited marital deduction: brainly.com/question/17983054
#SPJ4