I believe the answer is: A. Fewer unwanted telemarketing calls
The consumer protect laws allow the consumers to report business practices that violate their privacy or comfort (which is what many of them consider unwanted telemarketing calls are). The protection law could also prevent the price from goes too high, but it would not necessarily lower the average prices.
Answer: The correct answer:
A. Managing monetary policy.
Answer: Mutually exclusive
Explanation:
In probability theory and logic, two propositions or events are disjoint or mutually exclusive if both events cannot occur at the same time. An example is the outcomes derived from the single toss of a coin which either be head or tail
In the project example given, the theory used is called mutually exclusive since both projects can not be chosen at the same time and it is only one project at w time. Mutually exclusive events are also called independent events since they have no effect on the viability of the other options.
Answer:
Inventory= $251,540
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Swifty Company took a physical inventory on December 31 and determined that goods costing $203,600 were on hand. Not included in the physical count were $25,420 of goods purchased from Pelzer Corporation, f.o.b. shipping point, and $22,520 of goods sold to Alvarez Company for $32,230, f.o.b. destination.
Both the purchase and the sale must be accounted for in inventory. The purchase is FOB shipping point, therefore it is responsibility os Swifty. The sale was made FOB destination, as it is in transit, it is the responsibility of Swifty.
Inventory= 203,600 + 25,420 + 22,520= $251,540
Answer:
a.) Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.
Explanation:
"Nuclear power plants" are known to be<em> the most reliable source of electricity</em> there is in the world. However, they pose some<em> risks</em> especially when it comes to the possibility of a nuclear accident happening.
When it comes to "nuclear third party liability," a strict liability of the nuclear operator means that the victim has no fault in any situation that might occur. This means that <em>the operator is responsible or liable</em> of the power plant's dangerous nature of hazardous wastes.
Whether or not they have recently passed safety checks, there is no need for them to prove anything on he is at fault. So, <u>this makes Nukere liable for the situation.</u>
This explains the answer.
