The data are reported in the attached table.
We define the null hypothesis H₀ as the statement that is believed true until we prove it wrong with the test.
We define the alternative hypothesis H₁ as the statement we want to conclude with our test.
The difference in graffiti before (B) and after (A) will be:
d = A - B.
If the graffiti declined, it means that A will be smaller than B, therefore d should be negative.
Therefore we can set:
H₀ : μd ≥ 0
H₁ : μd < 0
The equal sign would mean that the number of graffiti incidents remained constant, therefore it is part of the null hypothesis.
Therefore the correct answer is B) H₀: μd ≥ 0 versus <span>H₁</span>: μd < 0
Answer:
sure! whats the question?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
40 unit^2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Area = 1/2 * base * altitude
= 1/2 * 8 * 10
= 40 unit^2.
We have the following data:
Margin of Error = E = 2.7 % = 0.027
Sample size = n = 900
Proportion of adults in favor = p = 60% = 0.6
We need to find the confidence level. For this first we need to find the z value.
The margin of error for a population proportion is given as:

Using the values, we get:
As, seen from the z table, z=1.65 corresponds to the confidence level 90%. So, the answer to this question is option B