Answer:
c) 48,000
Explanation:
<em>Equivalent Units</em>
To apportion cost between work in progress and completed units in a particular period, we use equivalent units. Equivalents units are notional whole units which represent incomplete work and are used to apportion cost between completed units and work in progress
<em>Equivalent Units = Degree of Completion × Units of products</em>
<em />
<em>Item units workings E.U</em>
Finished products 45,000 100% × 45,000 = 45,000
Closing WIP 5000 3/5 × 5000 = 3,000
Total equivalent unit 48,000
Equivalent unit for the conversion cost= 45000 +3000= 48,000
Answer:
$75.12 million
Explanation:
For computation of Valence's share price first we need to find out the share price which is shown below:-
Share price = (Paid earning of Valence × Ended year of expected earning) ÷ (Equity cost of capital - Expected growth rate)
= (40% × $800 million) ÷ (9% - 7%)
= (0.4 × $800 million) ÷ (0.09 - 0.07)
= $320 million ÷ 0.02
= $16,000 million
Now, Valence's share price
= Total value ÷ Outstanding total shares
= $16,000 million ÷ 213 million
= $75.12 million
<u><em>You should spend a large amount of time thinking about a big decision before you make it because it could have a huge impact in your life. You need to be able to decide if it is the right or wrong choice or if there is any consequences.</em></u>
The process of medical care in the unites states starts with the health services or primary care provided at the individual, this may be a visit to a clinic or a hospital. This will either be paid for by the individual or the insurance they are currently in, it may be in a public insurance policy or a private insurance policy.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
