1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lesechka [4]
3 years ago
14

The _____ amendment to the u.s. constitution prevents illegally seized evidence from being admissible in juvenile court, just as

in the adult criminal process.
Social Studies
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
3 0
He applied his skill in engineering to toughen up the defence
You might be interested in
Why does a border wall represent a violation of human rights?
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

The wall represents americas hatred for immigration, despite immigrants only looking for safety. Also, where there are walls there are commonly detention centers, which is the worst violation of human rights, as people there are beaten, starved, jailed, and mutilated.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Intro to Feudalism
sasho [114]

Answer:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
According to the ________ of attraction, we will like those whose behavior is rewarding to us, including those who are both able
Delicious77 [7]
The answer is "reward theory of attraction".

The Reward theory of attraction says we like the individuals who like us and give us compensating encounters. Individuals that truly compensate us are individuals who solicit little from us consequently. For instance you may feel remunerated when somebody you are pulled in to all of a sudden grins at you. It is soliciting next to no from you to restore the grin to make that individual your companion.
5 0
3 years ago
Can someone just make something up ? (:
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

Ok so whne i was little i thought it would be a good idea to run around the pool even though the lifegaurd said no but i continues and ended up falling and slipping in the pool and then sorta drowned now this is a formative experience since now i developed to know that i will not run around the pool again.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?
Ede4ka [16]
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were two ideals that he disagreed with earlier in his career but learned from experience and reinstated and strengthened to
    13·1 answer
  • Why did many southerners move to Texas
    11·1 answer
  • hich of these was the most noticeable symbol of the "Iron Curtain"? A) Great Wall B) Berlin Wall C) 38th Parallel D) 17th Parall
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a "trade or business" expense?
    6·1 answer
  • What does region mean??
    8·1 answer
  • Borderline personality order
    8·1 answer
  • What impact would stricter car emission standards in the United States most likely have on other countries?
    9·1 answer
  • I don’t know or get this question. my school doesn’t teach us anything! Question: why is it useful to be able to make generaliza
    15·1 answer
  • Help please and thank you
    14·1 answer
  • Read the following paragraph from the section "Seeking New Sources of Labor."
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!