1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kupik [55]
3 years ago
6

What of the following words would an author NOT use to establish the sequence of events in a story?

English
2 answers:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
6 0
"Forever" would not establish the sequence of events in a story. 
matrenka [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is FOREVER.

Explanation:

When establishing the sequence of events in a story an author would NOT use the word FOREVER. Instead, the writer can use the words "now, later, or tomorrow".

Events in a story are usually organized for the reader to follow them easily. In order to organize said events, it is useful to resort to the already mentioned expressions.

The word "forever" (because of its meaning) is not suitable to establish a period of time.

You might be interested in
Compound sentens the dog stayed on the trail I fell into a well​
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

The dog stayed on the trail and i fell into a well

Explanation:

the dog stayed on the trail but i fell into a well (both work).

8 0
3 years ago
What is setting?
Alexus [3.1K]
I would say the answer is B.
In a story, the setting is the time, place, and geographical location of where it is taking place.
8 0
3 years ago
How is the king characterized in this selection?
jarptica [38.1K]
C is the answer in my opinion
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write one to two sentences comparing how the author
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

Suzuki uses rhetorical questions and passionate language to attach with the audience in both versions. However, she also uses a frenzied tone of voice and eye contact to attach within the video.

Explanation:

I did it on edg.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the simmilarities and differences of critical thinking and critical listening?​
Ronch [10]

Answer & Explanation:

Critical thinking: It is the capability of an individual to think rationally and clearly about what to believe and what to do.

Critical listening: It is a form of listening that is responsible for evaluating the content of a specific message.

Similarities: Critical thinking engages highly active listening to improve critical thinking skills. Critical listening involves independent & reflective thinking.

Difference: Critical thinking involves the process through which individuals quantitatively and qualitatively assess specific information they tend to accumulate whereas Critical listening allows individuals to collect information in a certain way that tends to promote successful communication and critical thinking.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Thomas Paine commen sense it is not in the power of Britain to do this continent justice to be always running three of four thou
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT described as a characteristic of a person who takes part in positive social action?
    10·2 answers
  • How I can describe a who is transgender and he go to boys scout , I need help to describe that . Please I need help, write for m
    10·1 answer
  • What is the definition of “Socialism”?
    10·1 answer
  • 2. Which statement from the article would be MOST important to include in a summary of the
    12·1 answer
  • In Macbeth, what is the inciting incident?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a good example of narrowing a topic by asking more targeted questions
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Paulo's Pottery imports pots from Mexico. Paulo pays $2.65 for each pot he buys from
    11·1 answer
  • Read the paragraph.
    15·1 answer
  • . During which stage of the listening process would you pay close attention to the speaker's words, actions, and body language?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!