The production function gets flatter, while the total cost curve gets steeper due to the fact that C. <u>at higher levels of</u><em><u> production firms </u></em><u>require less inputs to increase production by the same amount as compared to lower levels of </u><u>production.</u>
The <em>production function</em> shows the relationship that exists between the inputs and the outputs during the production of a product.
It should be noted that <u>diminishing marginal product</u> is vital for explaining why the increase in the output of a firm results in the <em>production function</em> getting flatter. Also, the <em>total curve</em> becomes steeper.
Therefore, at higher levels of production, firms require fewer inputs to increase<em> production</em> by the same amount.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25162387
Answer: False
In the short-run, inflation and unemployment are inversely related; as one quantity increases, the other decreases. In the long-run, there is no trade-off. In the 1960's, economists believed that the short-run Phillips curve was stable.
Explanation:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-economics/chapter/the-relationship-between-inflation-and-unemployment/
Answer:
$43,030
Explanation:
IAS 2 Inventories states that inventory is to be recognized at cost, however, subsequent measurement requires that inventory be carried at the lower of cost or net realizable amount (NRV).
As such, where the cost of inventory is higher than the NRV, it is written down to the NRV using the following entries,
Debit Inventory write off/Cost of goods sold
Credit Inventory account
with the difference between the cost and the NRV.
Inventory Quantity Unit Cost Unit NRV New unit cost
Furniture 230 $88 $103 $88
Electronics 53 $430 $315 $315
From the analysis above, the cost of inventory is lower than the NRV for Furniture, hence no adjustment is required. However, the cost of Electronics is higher than the NRV hence a write down is required. This amount is
= ($430 - $315) × 53
=$115 × 53
= $6,095
Total recorded cost(ending) of inventory before any adjustment
= (230 × $88) + (53 × $430)
= $43,030
Answer:
14%
Explanation:
Let IRR from machine be represented with i
Now, $4,120 * Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = $16,000
Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = $16,000 / $4,120
Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = 3.883
Now, we refer to PV factor table, the PV Factor (3.883) falls nearest to i =14%. (See proof in the attached table as attached below)
So therefore, IRR = 14%
So, the machine's internal rate of return is closest to 14%.
