Answer:
Utilitarian decision making
Explanation:
She would make use of the utilitarian decision making which involves taking the decision which will least harm the people involved.
In Jessica’s case she would have to consider all her options and see which is the least harmful. If she were to turn in her paper as it is, she might get a bad grade, but she would be solely affected. If she decides to buy a paper, she could continue to take care of her grandmother and would guarantee her a good grade. If the teacher finds out she didn’t write the paper or it was plagiarized it could cause harm to her academic integrity. If she were to explain the whole thing to the teacher the next day, they might just give her an extension; if she were to buy a paper, then it wouldn’t be her honest work.
It is advisable for Jessica to just keep the paper she has and turn that in. It would be better for Jessica to be honest than cheating and buying someone else’s work.
Answer:Trained incapacity
Explanation:
Trained incapacity refers to an education , training and experience that causes an individual to have a limited thinking because they can't go beyond a set of constraints that has been for installed in their minds.
There are several types of trained incapacity
Bureaucrats & Rules
Bureaucrats may have a limited or constrained thinking when they deal with a process outside a set of rules.
Due to the fact that this knowledge, experience and education has been only trained in this capacity.
It leads to Resistance to Change
Trained incapacity makes it hard for people to accept organizational change.
When habitual activities have taken the capacity of thinking creatively and critically a system begin to feel like it's unchangeable and concrete.
Answer:
Jack is making a(n) internal attribution, while Jill is making a(n) external attribution.
Explanation:
The attribution theory in psychology explains people try to make sense of a behavior or event by assigning causes to it. When we say Jack is making an internal attribution, that means he thinks the cause for an event results from the involved person's personality, ability, skills, efforts, moods, etc. In other words, he somewhat blames the person for his own behavior. On the other hand, when we say Jill is making an external attribution, that means he explains the cause as a matter of luck. He understands the possibility of interference by other people or the environment, etc.
