Answer: B. African slaves
Explanation:
After the European impact on the cultural Latin American region, African slaves had the second most impact. Because Europeans had many slaves, and they had many in Latin America, slaves had a high impact.
The answer to the question is African slaves.
The reason why the media is sometimes referred to as the fourth branch of government is because the media can influence the decisions of the government and the public.
The media in every society can be very influential, they release information which can positively or negatively impact the actions of the governing body or even the general public.
By referring the media as the fourth branch of government, they check or monitor the various actions of the political leaders and this can influence how the general public view their government. The media is powerful and can positively or negatively influence the public.
Learn more here brainly.com/question/10234813?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
A. Federal law always supercedes state law.
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case which held that the Congress of the United States of America had authority, jurisdiction and power to regulate any interstate commerce with respect to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
In New York city, the state legislature granted a monopoly to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton an exclusive navigation rights or privileges of operating on all New York state waters with boats that are being moved either by steam or fire, for a time frame of thirty (30) years. Aaron Orgedon was the governor.
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that in business disputes, federal law always supercedes state law. It held that the permission granted to the state, New York city was monopolistic and as such was not permitted.
The correct answer to this question is "<span>It is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof."
</span>
The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. A historian most likely describe thisstatement by having it <span>truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof.</span>
