Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
Answer:
A firm's normal range of operating activities is relevant range of operations.
Explanation:
Relevant range of operations can be described simply as a firm or company's expected range of activities without any extreme economic conditions. It is the range where the firm operates in normal conditions. Within this range the firm's operations run smoothly. Outside this range revenue and expenditure may fluctuate from what was expected.
Answer:
Project A
Years Cashflows Discount factor Present values
0 250,000 1 -250,000
1-10 45,100 6.144 277,094.40
Sum of all present value=NPV=27,094.40
IRR (by using trial and error method) = 12.4696%
Note: Discount factor for the year 1-10 is calculated by using annuity formula i.e [1-(1+10%)]/10% = 6.144
Project B
Years Cashflows Discount factor Present values
0 (350,000) 1 (350,000)
1 72,500 0.91 65,975
2 65,500 0.83 54,365
3 73,800 0.75 55,350
4 71,500 0.68 48,620
5 69,800 0.62 43,276
6 75,500 0.56 42,280
7 31,000 0.51 15,810
8 47,500 0.47 22,325
9 55,500 0.42 23,310
10 29,200 0.38 11,096
Sum of all present values=NPV=32,407
IRR(by using trial and error method=12.4186%
On the basis of NPV project B is better because it gives higher NPV than project A. Whereas, Project A is better than project B on the basis of IRR because project A has slightly higher IRR than project B.
b)The conflict between both the investment appraisal technique is likely due to different cash flow patterns of both the project. In such situation decision should be based on NPV because this is an absolute measure
The future value of an ordinary annuity of $60 paid at the end of each quarter for 3 years, if interest is earned at a rate of 4%, compounded quarterly will be 907.2$
<h3>What is Compounding?</h3>
Compounding is the method through which interest is added to both the principle balance already in place and the interest that has already been paid. Thus, compounding can be thought of as interest on interest, with the result that returns on interest are magnified over time, or the so-called "magic of compounding." After a year, you would receive $10 in interest if you deposited $1,000 into an account with a 1% annual interest rate. Compound interest allowed you to earn 1 percent on $1,010 in Year Two, which amounted to $10.10 in interest payments for the year.
Hence, The future value of an ordinary annuity of $60 paid at the end of each quarter for 3 years, if interest is earned at a rate of 4%, compounded quarterly will be 907.2$
To learn more about compounding click,
brainly.com/question/24274034
#SPJ4
That would be:
B.) Defualt
