Answer:
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC and given a chart with which Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate"
Step-by-step explanation:
F(x) = g(x)
3(2) - 4 = (2)² - 2
6 - 4 = 4 - 2
2 = 2
I just substituted all the values in the domain to see which one would work. That's not really the quickest way but that's the only way I know
Answer:
he has 0.66 of fabrics remaining, 0.66 can be 33/50
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
120°
i finished the quiz and that what i got
and for the rest
1.b
2.d
3.a
4.c
and number 5 is the first answer that i wrote
Step-by-step explanation:
Rigid transformation do not alter the sides and angle measurements of a shape.
The true statements are:
- <em>quadrilateral 1 and quadrilateral 2 - Not congruent
</em>
- <em>quadrilateral 1 and quadrilateral 3 - Not congruent
</em>
- <em>quadrilateral 1 and quadrilateral 4 - Not congruent
</em>
- <em>quadrilateral 2 and quadrilateral 3 - Congruent
</em>
<em />
From the graph, we have the following highlights
- Quadrilaterals 2, 3 and 4 are congruent
- Quadrilateral 1 does not have equal measure with any of the other quadrilaterals.
Hence, the first three statements are not congruent, while the last statement is congruent.
Read more about congruent shapes at:
brainly.com/question/24430586
