One pound is about 0.5, so pretty much divide it by half
Sin(x)=40/50
x= sin^-1(40/50)
x= 53.1301023542—>53.1 rounded to the nearest tenth
angle of elevation is 53.1
Yooo finally someone that plays
177 miles/3 hour x (5280 ft/1 mile) x (1 hour/3600 seconds)=934560/10800=86.533 ft/sec
86 ft/sec
A geometric mean is often used when comparing different items—finding a single "figure of merit" for these items—when each item has multiple properties that have different numeric ranges.[1]<span> For example, the geometric mean can give a meaningful "average" to compare two companies which are each rated at 0 to 5 for their environmental sustainability, and are rated at 0 to 100 for their financial viability. If an arithmetic mean were used instead of a geometric mean, the financial viability is given more weight because its numeric range is larger—so a small percentage change in the financial rating (e.g. going from 80 to 90) makes a much larger difference in the arithmetic mean than a large percentage change in environmental sustainability (e.g. going from 2 to 5). The use of a geometric mean "normalizes" the ranges being averaged, so that no range dominates the weighting, and a given percentage change in any of the properties has the same effect on the geometric mean. So, a 20% change in environmental sustainability from 4 to 4.8 has the same effect on the geometric mean as a 20% change in financial viability from 60 to 72.</span>
