Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>2.1</h2><h2>
<em><u>that's</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>thank</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>
1.) Word form: two hundred thirty-six and seventy-seven thousandths
Expanded notation: 200
+ 30
+ 6 + 0.0 + 0.07 + 0.007
There are no underlines?
3.) tenth: 7.3 hundredth: 7.31 thousandth: 7.305 whole number: 7
4.) Estimate: 10,400
Answer is 10,417
No, it is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that is obtained when you cube an integer. For example, 8 (cube of 2), 27 (cube of 3) and 64 (cube of 4). Since -3 cannot be obtained by cubing an integer, it is not a perfect cube.
Answer: The variables have a weak positive correlation
Since r > 0, the correlation is positive. It's a weak correlation because r is closer to 0 than it is to 1.
Answer:
15 - 5x = 5 · 3 - 5 · x = 5(3 - x)
