Answer:
Governments can be run and managed well or poorly based on leaders in charge- look at explanation
Explanation:
A government can usually dictate to some degree what people do. So if the government passes a law that bans a certain race or gender from doing a certain thing, whether it be applying for a job, or eating at a certain restaurant, then the government is limiting human rights. This, morally to us as a modern society as seen as a bad thing because it judges people based on things they cannot change, instead of things people can change like attitude or character. Now lets say a government decided to pass a law that provided healthcare or education for its people. This would be a good thing because people who become educated or maintain their health will most likely be beneficial to the society that they are a part of.
"Farmers free access to the rail lines" benefit railroad companies provided that allowed farming to expand in west Texas
<u>Explanation:</u>
The first to grow crops on West Texas soil were Native Americans and settlers, who saw the area as a land of opportunity and quickly followed. Everything from corn, cantaloupe, and cotton was successfully tried as peasants adjusted to their climate with resilience.
The construction of railroads in West Texas enabled ranchers and farmers move their goods more effectively and by the end of the 19th century, Texas had rowed as a leading producer in cattle as well as cotton.
Answer:
ok
Explanation:
The only ones who can run for political office are the nes who are according to the law and have no debits with it. The first point is to bel legally able to ellect a candidate and and be indicated asa candidate who can be voted and elected.
<span>Why might the catholic church have found the ideas of ignatius to be particularly relevant to the catholic reformarion?</span>
