Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
The answers are profane and sacred. According to French
Sociologist, Emile Durkheim, Australian Aborigines separated their domain into
the profane or the scope of repetitive, average life, and the sacred or the
sphere endowed with divine significance. Aboriginal Australians or also known
as Australian Aborigines are a group of indigenous people found in the mainland
of Australia or the island of Tasmania.
The scary noise in the scenario in which a little boy is allowed to play with a laboratory rat and shows no fear of it. then,and a scientist makes a scary noise by banging an iron bar whenever the little boy reaches for the rat and because of this the boy begins crying whenever the rat comes near him is <span> unconditioned stimulus. </span><span> Unconditioned stimulus is a stimulus that naturally, and automatically triggers a response. In this case such stimulus is the noise.</span>
The Titan Rain is a name given by the US federal government to a group of hackers who performed a serious of cyber attacks back in 2003. They targeted US Department of Defence and similar agencies. Therefore, they would be charged with computer crimes and hacking.
I'm not quite sure this is an answer it gives, but with lack of water people become week and tend to do anything to satisfy their thirst. Therefore the advantage point could be the fact that people were weak.
Plessy V Ferguson was a supreme court case back in the late 1800s. It created the "separate but equal" statement to make sure even if colored and white people were separated, they both would be "equal". A man named Homer Plessy had refused to sit in a train car that was designated for black people which stirred trouble.
