1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solniwko [45]
3 years ago
12

I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE

Social Studies
1 answer:
gladu [14]3 years ago
8 0
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>

...it is hard to believe that it could ever 

You might be interested in
Rosa has been working the same job for 10 years and has not yet received a promotion. Although she is not feeling appreciated by
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

Instrumental Value

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question Rosa's behavior to remain with the organization in order to receive her bonus reflects an Instrumental Value. This term refers to all the behaviors and actions that are done in order to achieve a certain goal, either long or short term. Which basically reflects all that Rosa has done in these 10 years just to receive her bonus.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP ME OUT PLS!!!!!
madreJ [45]

Answer:

all the roads are open during the winter except for roaring fork motor nature trail

3 0
2 years ago
Help please im 5th grade help a brother out hurry
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

rain=wet snow=white sleet=sticky snow hail= ice balls

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer all 4.ANY SILLY ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED LIKE TYPING SOMETHING RANDOM.IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER DON'T ANSWER.LI
expeople1 [14]
PLEASE MARK THIS BRAINLIEST IF YOU CAN!!!

16. Two inventions in Ancient India include the ruler and plastic surgery. The ruler was invented in 2400 BC because ancient indians needed a form of measurement. Plastic surgery was invented in 2000 BC and was usually practiced on faces to reconstruct defects.

17. A structure invented in Ancient India that demonstrates advanced architecture is the weighing scale, the scale had to have had a lot of precise planned structure done to be created.

18. Three important components of Hinduism are artha (means prosperity), kama (meaning passions) and moksha (which is freedom from the cycle of death and rebirth/salvation).

19. Some similarities between Ancient India and other early civilizations are that they all built cities, invented forms of writing, and learned to make pottery.

hope this helps luv <3, let me know if you need help with anything else! :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do most elections for local, state, and federal offices have in common?
kicyunya [14]
<h3>Answer:</h3>

A). They are winner-takes-all elections.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

The reason why answer choice "A). They are winner-takes-all elections" is the correct answer because this is what our local, state, and federal elections use to elect someone for office.

The term "winner-takes-all" pretty much means who ever wins get everything, in this case the position in office. The winner-takes-all is implemented in the election because the person that has the most votes would win, so they would take the position in office.

The U.S has been using the winner-takes-all method for many years. This allows people to choose a representative that they think would be the best in office for the city, state, or country.

For example, the U.S President election runs by the "winner-takes-all" method because which ever candidate has the most electoral votes wins, or they just need to hit the 270 electoral votes to win. This is how "winner-takes-all" works in the elections.

<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Values tell one to what he or she "ought" to do. they serve as a moral compass that directs one's motivation and, potentially, h
    14·1 answer
  • Why did northern ireland, scotland, and Wales gain their own legislatures?
    6·1 answer
  • Is science and religion able to coexist?, why?
    6·1 answer
  • Which scenario fits under daniel kahnman's system 2 of thinking?
    5·2 answers
  • Which court is the final authority on the meaning of the constitution?
    5·2 answers
  • What are two of the building blocks that help makeup social structure?
    14·1 answer
  • During two decades of pitching in the negro leagues, what did Satchel Paige prove about baseball fans?
    8·1 answer
  • The economy of early villages and cities was based mainly on
    5·1 answer
  • What significant challenge did cities face as a result of rapid industrialization in the 1800s?
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the sentence containing the correct usage of commas.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!