Yeah huh" you have to explain what you wanted
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Evidences that have been analyzed in violation to the right of a defendant can't be used or presented in the court of law, just like the option states ,it has violated the rights and according to the law should not be used in presenting a case to the judge , so option B best explains what the exclusionary rules states.
Answer:
Split-half Method.
Explanation:
Split half test is the method to assess the reliability of internal consistency.
Split-Half method is a reliability test in which to gain insight about a single knowledge, the test is divided into two parts. Then two groups of students or people are required to participate in the test at the same time. The scores of both the groups are assessed. A test that have high correlation suggests the reliability and will reveal how well or poorly the students will perform in the test.
<u>In the given case, Chan has divided the test questions into five questions each for two groups, to check the reliability of instrument. The results of both the test are assessed with the hope that they have similar results. This is the method of testing reliability with the split-half method</u>.
So, the correct answer is split-half method.
