Insufficient funds and irregular signatures are reasons why a cheque may not be cleared in time.
<h3>What is a Cheque?</h3>
This can be defined as a written, dated, and signed instrument which directs a bank to pay a specific sum of money to the bearer.
Insufficient funds and irregular signatures may delay the clearing of cheque which is a result of human error and could lead to returning it.
Read more about Cheque here brainly.com/question/24555580
The answer is E. i might be wrong
Answer: Decrease
Explanation:
According to the Law of Demand, The quantity demanded for purchase of a commodity inversely varies with the price.
That is to say that "ceteris paribus" ( with everything being equal),When the prices of a particular good go higher, people will buy less of such commodity but will buy more, if the prices of the goods reduces.
We can say demand is elastic if quantity demanded for a commodity decreases with increase in price which will make people choose another lower substitute good eg, detergent, ice cream
Also if quantity demanded does not change much with increase in price , then it is referred to as Inelastic Demand for example necessity commodity such as gasoline.
Answer:
The correct option is (b)
Explanation:
Given:
Monthly payment for 6 months = $30 per month
Time period = 6 month (6 periods)
Monthly interest rate = 2%
In order to compute borrowed amount, present value of these payments need to be computed which is an annuity as same amount of $30 is paid.
Checking PVIFA table for 2%, 6 periods, annuity factor is 5.6014.
Borrowed amount = Monthly payment × PVIFA(2%,6)
= 30 × 5.6014
= $168.042
Borrowed amount is $168.042 or $168.22 approximately (difference in value due to annuity factor being rounded off)
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
