The statement the articles of confederation gave a president the power to execute laws and veto legislation is false.
<h3><u>
Explanation:
</u></h3>
The very reason behind opting to replace the "Articles of Confederation" was that they created an imbalance of power by vesting more power in the hands of the state governments. There are no provisions provided by Articles of Confederation for an executive branch.
The President and the Federal government functioned with very little authority and were greatly under powered. The President almost functioned like a nominal head.The legislature holds the executive power under the "Articles of Confederation".
I believe the answer is: concept of <span>conservation
concept of conservation refers to the understanding that something would stay in the same quantity even though it is moved to different medium/appearances.
On average, understanding of </span>concept of conservation would not be developed before we enter the age of 7.
Answer:
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Answer: D. Maria would not have to pay anything
Explanation:
Maria would not have to pay anything because this does not fall under the terms of a QUASI CONTRACT as she did not gain unjustified enrichment.
In a QUASI contract, the main bone of contention is the ACCEPTANCE of a service but not the AGREEMENT of terms which can lead to unjust enrichment. In other words, if you ACCEPT a service but did not request it, you still have to pay.
Maria in this case neither requested NOR ACCEPTED the service and so she does not have to pay.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Unlike in many countries, the judges of the US Supreme Court serve for a lifetime. There is no retirement age for judges and they can hold their office as long as they do not get impeached by the congress. </em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judges are given this privilege to ensure that they are free from political pressure and act strictly according to the law without favouring unjust causes.
The Supreme Court checks the power of other branches of government using the system of judicial review. If the presidential actions or decisions do not abide by the constitution the courts can declare them unconstitutional.
