Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
It implies there are diseconomies of scale.
Explanation:
It implies there are diseconomies of scale in the industry
Because as the quantity of units output increase, the cost also increase. While in economies of scale, the slope for the LRAC will be negative, as each increase in output lowers the cost.
When this occurs, there is a lower change of monopoly in the industry, as the larger firm also faces the larger cost, so the supply tend to be more diverse.
While a, indifined negative slope will generate monopolies as their cost become lower at gerater the output.
Answer:
c. unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Under the first amendment the act of banning such printed materials is unconstitutional. As it is not good for people in the country to witness such things.
As printed material includes books, magazines, and other things which enhance the knowledge level of different people.
Therefore, banning printed material will make the country people short of knowledgeable resources.
Therefore, the court will announce it unconstitutional.
Answer: The monthly payment will be $2007.81.
We have:
Cost of the sports coupe (PV) $84,500
Annual Percentage Rate (APR) 6.6%
Loan tenure in months (n) 48
We can find the monthly payment by using the Present value of an annuity formula:
![\mathbf{PV_{Annuity}= PMT * \left ( \frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} \right )}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BPV_%7BAnnuity%7D%3D%20PMT%20%2A%20%5Cleft%20%28%20%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D)
Since APR is a yearly number, we need to convert it into a monthly rate.
So , ![r = \frac{0.066}{12} = 0.0055](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B0.066%7D%7B12%7D%20%3D%200.0055)
Plugging values in the PV formula above we get,
![\mathbf{84500 = PMT * \left ( \frac{1-(1+0.0055)^{-48}}{0.0055} \right )}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7B84500%20%3D%20PMT%20%2A%20%5Cleft%20%28%20%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.0055%29%5E%7B-48%7D%7D%7B0.0055%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D)
![\mathbf{84500 = PMT * \left ( \frac{1-0.768529253}{0.0055} \right )}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7B84500%20%3D%20PMT%20%2A%20%5Cleft%20%28%20%5Cfrac%7B1-0.768529253%7D%7B0.0055%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D)
![\mathbf{84500 = PMT * \left ( \frac{0.231470747}{0.0055} \right )}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7B84500%20%3D%20PMT%20%2A%20%5Cleft%20%28%20%5Cfrac%7B0.231470747%7D%7B0.0055%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D)
![\mathbf{84500 = PMT * 42.08559028}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7B84500%20%3D%20PMT%20%2A%2042.08559028%7D)
![\mathbf{\frac{84500}{42.08559028}= PMT}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7B%5Cfrac%7B84500%7D%7B42.08559028%7D%3D%20PMT%7D)
![\mathbf{PMT = 2007.813112}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BPMT%20%3D%202007.813112%7D)