Answer:
20 more tons of pollution into the air, and Firm B will emit 100 fewer tons of pollution into the air.
Explanation:
It is given that :
Amount of tons of pollutants emitted by the two firms A and B earlier = 100 tons
Cost of pollutants by firm A = $ 200 per ton of pollutions
Cost of pollutants by firm B = $ 100 per ton of pollutions
Since the cost for eliminating the pollutants into the air is more for the firm A, the ticket is also more valuable for firm A. And therefore, firm A will buy all the tickets form firm B for an amount around $ 101 to $ 199. It will do so as to have a positive consumer and also to produce surplus.
So firm A will eliminate 20 tons of pollution and will use 80 ton capacity from the tickets. And for firm B, it will eliminate all 100 tons of pollutions.
Answer:
The Journal entries are as follows:
(i) On April 6,
Cash A/c Dr. $5,000
To Sales $5,000
(To record the cash sales )
(ii) On April 6,
Cost of goods sold A/c Dr. $3,000
To merchandise inventory $3,000
(To record the cost of goods sold)
(iii) On April 12,
Sales return and Allowances A/c Dr. $630
To cash $630
(To record the sales return)
(iv) On April 12,
merchandise inventory A/c[(630 ÷ 5,000) × 3,000] Dr. $378
To cost of goods sold $378
(To record the cost of sales return and allowances
Depends on the banks policy. My bank is pretty good, and with my opt in overdraft protection, there are no incurred fees.
<span>The only way to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables is to conduct an experiment.
First we state a hypothesis and then we make the experiment. The experiment should </span>support, refute, or validate our hypothesis. It is done by making<span> changes in one variable and observing is that might </span>lead to<span> changes in another variable (cause-and-effect).</span>
The correct answer would be A
