1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
3 years ago
6

What would happen if currency in all countries had fewer denominations? People would be more likely to confuse the value of curr

encies. Exchanging money between countries would be much easier. People could not charge as many different prices for goods. All goods would be more expensive than they currently are.
Business
2 answers:
pantera1 [17]3 years ago
6 0

ANSWER: C) People could not charge as many different prices for goods.

EXPLANATION: If a currency has fewer denominations, then it would be a problem to charge different prices for goods as the change will not be available. For example, if the country is having currency for only $ 50 and $100, then the products can not be priced at $5 or $10. Even the smallest item will have a minimum price of $50 which will be not be worth of. The price of the products will either decrease or increase drastically. Proper pricing of any product will not be possible and it will affect the common people.

Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
6 0

<u>If there would be fewer denominations of currencies in all countries then people will not be able to charge as many different prices for goods. </u>

Further explanation:

If currency in all countries had fewer denominations, then the price-setters and producers will not be able to set any price for goods. This is because the availability of fewer denominations of currency will pose a problem in setting any price for the goods as the change will not be available for purchase.

Justification for the correct and incorrect answer:

People would be more likely to confuse the value of currencies: This option is incorrect.

People would not be confused about the value of currencies when there would be very few denominations available in all countries. This is because the value would be well-specified on the currency whose few denominations are available.  

Exchanging money between countries would be easier: This option is incorrect.

The exchange of money between countries would be difficult to execute when all countries would have fewer denominations of currency. Any specific amount would not be traded across countries then due to a lack of enough denominations of currency.

People could not charge as many different prices for goods: This option is correct.

When currencies in all countries would have fewer denominations, in that case, price-setters and producers cannot charge as many different prices for goods. This is because of a lack of change with consumers will pose a problem in charging any price by the producer.  

All goods would be more expensive than they currently are: This option is incorrect.

If currencies of all countries would have fewer denominations, then it would not change the demand or supply of goods as long as the prices that are set by the producers are consistent with the available denominations. Thus, there is no reason that the goods will become more expensive than they currently are.  

Therefore,people could not charge as many various prices for goods, in case of availability of fewer denominations of currencies in all countries.  

Learn more:

1. Learn more about inflation and money

<u>brainly.com/question/2974782 </u>

2. Learn more about exchange

<u>brainly.com/question/3814456 </u>

3. Learn more about motivation effect from money

<u>brainly.com/question/10539732 </u>

Answer details:

Grade: Senior School

Subject: Economics

Chapter: Money and banking

Keywords: what would happen, if currencies, in all countries, fewer denominations, more likely, to confuse, the value of currencies, exchanging money between, countries, much easier, people could not, charge, as many different prices, all goods, would be, more expensive, than, they currently are.  

You might be interested in
If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, what reasoning is most likely underlying her argument?
mylen [45]

Answer:

If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:

  • Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.

Explanation:

  • The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
  • This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
  • For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.
4 0
3 years ago
Describe the challenges and opportunities of globalization in a ""flattened"" world.
Ksju [112]

Answer:

The meaning of a 'flattened' world is that ,globalization, which can be described as inventions and various developments in the technology world , has created a level playing ground, where countries considered as small or minors are now competing with the super-power ones.

Explanation:

The major challenge of this is that , the rate competition has increased between countries that have great impacts on the resource area of businesses.

And the opportunities are that, new jobs are created or available especially in the information systems and other jobs or occupations involving services.

 Finding better suppliers and at a better price has also been considered as a big benefit because now there were more places to choose from globally.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A farmer has cash costs of S1.50/bu for his corn. The opportunity cost of his labor is S0.30/bu and the opportunity cost of his
Ghella [55]

Answer:

C. $0.30/bu

Explanation:

Given that

Cash cost = $1.50/bu

Opportunity cost of labour = $0.30/bu

Opportunity cost of Land = $0.40/bu

Sales from corn = $2.50/bu

Recall that economic profits = Total income - Total expenses - opportunities cost

Therefore

Economic profits = 2.50 - 1.50 - (0.30 + 0.40)

= 2.50 - 1.50 - 0.70

= 0.30

Therefore, economic profits = $0.30/bu

4 0
3 years ago
Pat manages the customer care department of her firm. She is very happy with her team of 15 customer care representatives​ who'v
Serggg [28]

Answer:

Motivation

Explanation:

<em>Motivation in work is when employees are incentivized due to their good performance</em>, this happens when they provide the company a greater value. There are two kinds of motivation:

  • Internal: it includes emotions and thoughts, <em>in the exercise given this internal motivation is letting the team know that they are doing good</em>
  • External: includes salary and work environment, <em>in the case given the bonuses are the external motivation</em>

I hope you find this information is useful and interesting! Good luck!

3 0
3 years ago
g The Ricardian equivalence states that if the government cuts taxes without changing current or future expenditure then: a) hou
Aleks [24]

Answer:

b) households will save more because they will expect higher taxes in the future

Explanation:

The Ricardian Equivalence proposition is one of the pillars of classical economics, which sadly has proven to not work very well in the real world. According to classical economists, and their quantity theory of money plus the Ricardian Equivalence, recessions do not exist because it is impossible for them to exist. But in the real world, that is not true. Recessions exist, e.g. the US is in a recession since the first quarter of 2020 (even before the current health crisis). When real people lose their jobs or are afraid to lose their jobs, their spending habits change.

On the other hand, when real people get a tax refund or tax cut, they generally spend it, they will not save it to pay future taxes. That is why car sales increase during February after checks form the IRS are handed out.

Theoretically, classical economics is great. The problem is that we are human beings, and as such, our behavior cannot be controlled or determined by what we should or should not do. This is exactly why the velocity of money (quantitative theory of money) is not constant.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain briefly why the private market for public goods is typically characterized by underprovision. Under what situations will
    5·1 answer
  • Matthew, vice president of human resources at Gamma Phi Corporation, is a(n) Multiple Choice middle-level manager. board manager
    6·1 answer
  • There are two general types of franchises: product-distribution and __________ franchises.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following policies are consistent with the goal of increasing productivity and growth in developing countries? Chec
    15·1 answer
  • Pair Co. sells one product and uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to determine inventory cost. Information for the month
    14·1 answer
  • You are considering a project in Norway with an initial cost of NKr135,000. The project is expected to return a one-time payment
    7·1 answer
  • 4) An investor has $60,000 to invest in a $280,000 property. She can obtain either a $220,000 loan at 9.5 percent for 20 years o
    5·1 answer
  • Why are most economies in the world today considered mixed economies?.
    9·1 answer
  • Why do people start business?​
    14·1 answer
  • an activity-based costing system blank . multiple select question. uses numerous overhead cost pools is used for external report
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!