Answer:
Legal but Unethical
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Gander's business conduct is Legal but Unethical. It is legal because since it is a developing country there is most likely no law against the amount that the company's must pay employees. On the other hand it is unethical because the company is taking advantage of the necessity of the workers and is paying them nonliving wages.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
Explanation:
given data
invest = $1000
pay compound interest = 10%
pay simple interest = 10%
time = 1 year
solution
we get here difference in the total amount that is your friend money - your money .................1
so difference in the total amount = invest × 
- [ invest + ( invest × rate × time) ] ......................2
put here value
difference in the total amount = $1000 × 
- [$1000 + ( 1000 × 10% × 1) ]
difference in the total amount = 0
so correct answer is c. You both have the same amount of money
The two primary varieties of price restrictions are known as price ceilings and price floors respectively.
<h3>What exactly are these pricing controls?</h3>
Price control is a technique that the government uses to guarantee that the price of a product or service on the market does not become too high or cheap.
Price controls may be broken down into two categories: price ceilings and price floors. Price floors and ceilings are used to determine the lowest and maximum amounts of a product's price, respectively. Price ceilings are used to determine the maximum amount of a product's price.
Read more about Price controls
brainly.com/question/1150883
#SPJ1
Answer: d. company directors; shareholders
Explanation: The conduction and management of a business usually involve making controversial decisions or taking actions that might put the business at risk. In a general sense, greater profits calls for greater risks. As such, the business judgement rule states that the board of directors should be allowed to make such decisions without fear of prosecution by shareholders who might object while acknowledging that managers are not capable of making optimal decisions at all times. The rule therefore aid in protecting a business's board of directors from slight legal allegations about the conduct of business. It is thus important because it reflects the principle that company directors, not shareholders, have the greatest latitude to run companies.
