Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
A:communist hope this helps :)
Answer:
Well I am going into a trade. You can always use your knowledge for your advantage, like for instance you do breaks at your job and on your personal car your brakes go out you could buy the parts and replace it yourself without spending more money on someone else doing the labor. And the same thing goes with plumbing or electrical.
Explanation:
The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.
Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.
The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.
learn more about the finance laws here
brainly.com/question/515053
#SPJ4
Answer:
He supports the president, advising him when necessary while also enforcing the congresses written law and is president of the U.S senate.
Explanation:
