What aspects of the New Deal, if any, do you see in American society today?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Afina-wow [57]3 years ago

8 0

New deal is still affecting American society today with its heavy focus on privatization and globalization.

Explanation:

There are several institutions that form the backbone of the globalized and free trade economy of US that was founded in the time of the passing of the New Deal which is responsible for change to those form of practices.

These include:

Federal Housing Administration (FHA)

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC),

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

These are the institutions that are safeguard of the type of economy founded in the New deal.

You might be interested in

I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE

gladu [14]

Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethicsemphasises the value of every human beingDuty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.says some acts are always wrongKantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.provides 'certainty'Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.deals with intentions and motivesConsequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.Bad points of duty-based ethicsabsolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.allows acts that make the world a less good placeBecause duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:

...it is hard to believe that it could ever

8 0

3 years ago

"an initially neutral stimulus that comes to elicit a response because it has been paired with an unconditioned stimulus is call

Natasha2012 [34]

This initially neutral stimulus is called a conditioned stimulus.

A neutral stimulus on its own should produce no reaction, but if used together with an unconditioned stimulus (that causes either atraction or rejection), and after a series of repetitions, it will trigger the same reaction as the one generated by the unconditioned stimulus with which is paired.

This learning mechanism which involves an unconditioned stimulus, and a neutral one which becomes conditioned, is known as classical conditioning.

7 0

3 years ago

What is russian roulette?

elena55 [62]

Russian Roulette is a game where 2 or more people sit at a table and they spin a revolver with only one bullet in the chamber who ever the barrel of the gun points at takes the gun, spins the chamber, points it at there head and pulls the trigger if the don't die they then don't get shot they repeat this process till someone gets shot who ever lives wins obviously

7 0

3 years ago

Why did british partitioned bengal in 1905

Elis [28]

Answer:

The British partitioned Bengal so that the province of Bengal can be easily and more safely governed compared to the large province being governed as a single province.

Explanation:

At the time of the partition, Bengal was the largest province of the Indian states under the Britishers. The Lieutenant Governor Lord Curzon believed that it will be easier to "divide" the province and rule if the province is made into smaller provinces.

Following the policy of "divide and rule", Bengal was partitioned into two- East and West Bengal, separating the Hindus and Muslim population. Though the 'alleged' intention was to separate Bengal and not on religious grounds, the separation ended in a chasm between the Hindus and Muslims. But the main reason for the Partition of Bengal was for administrative purposes, to make the governing of the provinces easier and more accessible.

4 0

3 years ago

How did passage of the indian self-determination act of 1975 meet a main demand of native american advocacy groups?

Vlad [161]

The self-determination act promotes Indian self-government which allows them to rule over of the delivery services. This acknowledges the Indians to have independence and discipline in their affairs. The demand of the Native American activists is for the tribes to take over the resources and education.

5 0

3 years ago