Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First let us evaluate the value of both the expressions.
a) Hence, Larry's claim that both the expressions are equivalent is wrong.
The evaluation of the expressions have been shown above. The second expression was obtained by swapping the addition and multiplication order and that created the difference.
b) Clearly,
520 > 264
Therefore,
is greater by the expression
by a value of 520 - 264 = 256.
Answer:
The relationship B is different than the other three, because it has a different proportionality constant.
Step-by-step explanation:
All available options show direct relationships, which are defined as follows:
(1)
Where:
- Independent variable, dimensionless.
- Dependent variable, dimensionless.
- Proportionality constant, dimensionless.
We proceed to use the following strategy based on the proportionality constant, that is:
A different relationship must indicate a different proportionality constant:
Option A (,
)
Option B (,
)
Option C (,
)
Option D (,
)
The relationship B is different than the other three, because it has a different proportionality constant.