Answer: Because the issuer official no longer holds elected office, the contribution limits of Rule G-37 do not apply.
Explanation:
Rule G-37 is a way to ensure that Municipal Issuers are not unduly influenced by those who donated to their campaigns to get into a position to become Municipal Issuers.
It prohibites for 2 years, Municipal Finance Professionals (MFP) amongst others from engaging in municipal securities business with a Municipal issuer.
An exception however, is that if the MFP is entitled to a vote for the Official in question, they can donate no more than $250 per election.
Seeing as the Municipal Issuer Officer has lost her position, the MFP need not worry about this $250 limit as it no longer applies to her. The MFP is free to donate $500 to the "clean-up" campaign.
Answer:
The total shareholders’ equity at the end of Year 1 is $487,400
Explanation:
The computation of the ending total shareholders’ equity is shown below:
= Common stock value in exchange of cash + net income + net holding gains - dividend paid
= $442,400 + $98,000 + $1,000 - $54,000
= $487,400
While calculating the ending balance of shareholder equity we added the net income, net holding gains and deducted the dividend paid to the common stock value amount
Answer:
$44,377
Explanation:
Note: The answers (options) attached this question belongs to another question
Particulars Amount
Salaries ($48,000*1,200/3,500) $16,457
Depreciation ($24,000*$102,600/$270,000) $9,120
Advertising ($47,000*$346,000/$865,000) <u>$18,800</u>
Total <u>$44,377</u>
Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.
