Irrational number has unsolvable root overs.
Last two are now our options
Hence its not irrotational.
Hence
Option C is irrational.
Answer:
D) Health insurers can never discriminate based on genetic information in this way
Answer: Playing chess with Katie cause who'd play chess by themself right?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Table 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the tables:
<u>Table 1:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 6 8
<u>Table 2:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 8 16
<u>Table 3:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 7 11
<u>Table 4:</u>
x: 1 2 3 4
y: 2 4 6 10
An exponential growth data set will show a common ratio between y values. Let's look at each of the ratios from each table.
<u>Table 1:</u>
8/6 = 4/3
6/4 = 3/2
Already, we can see that 4/3 ≠ 3/2, which means that this doesn't have a common ratio. So Table 1 is wrong.
<u>Table 2:</u>
16/8 = 2
8/4 = 2
4/2 = 2
The common ratio here is 2, so we know this is correct.
<u>Table 3:</u>
11/7 = 1.57
7/4 = 1.75
Again, we can see that 1/57 ≠ 1.75, so this is wrong.
<u>Table 4:</u>
10/6 = 1.67
6/4 = 1.5
Again, there is no common ratio here, so this is wrong.
The answer is thus Table 2.
