Delaware<span>, </span>Pennsylvania,New Jersey,Georgia<span>, </span>Connecticut<span>,
</span>Massachusetts<span>
Bay, </span>Maryland<span>, South Carolina, New Hampshire, </span>Virginia<span>, New York, North Carolina, Rhode island</span>
Pennsylvania was the first
Answer: He advocated for their freedom and instead supported the use of African American slaves, so in a way he protected them. He felt bad for them and wanted to do his best to fight for them. Las Casas witnessed a massacre of poorly armed natives, a scene he would never forget. He traveled around the island a great deal and was able to see the deplorable conditions in which the natives lived. After that he decided it was his duty to help.
Explanation:
Bartolomé de las Casas spent 50 years of his life actively fighting slavery and the colonial abuse of indigenous peoples, especially by trying to convince the Spanish court to adopt a more humane policy of colonization.
Two things that the Radical Republicans insisted be part of their Reconstruction plan was that the military would stay in the South to supervise the transition, and that the newly freed slaves would be offered all the freedoms of whites in the South.
Answer:
The contradiction exists at the moment when the narrator affirms that in emio the scarcity of food, the grains of the peasants were seized.
Explanation:
A text presents a contradiction when it presents an incompatibility between two premises, where one cancels the meaning of the other or leaves that meaning imprecise and unreliable. An example of this can be seen in the text shown in the question above, in the lines "In fact, food supplies were so short that Lenin had to send the secret police, the 'Cheka', into the countryside to seize the grain supplies of peasants, "where the narrator says there was a severe shortage of food, but then he says the peasants had enough grain to be seized.
