Answer:
The judiciary is regarded as the nation's moral conscience in democracy. People anticipate that an independent judiciary should tell truth the people about the political power instead of being influenced by it. The political history of Nepal shows centralisation of power, first in the hands of Rana rulers, and then the Shah kings. The political changes of 1990 led to the substantial reform in the judicial system. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1990, for the first time, guaranteed the independence of the judiciary.
Well, you own what is in your title, which means your lawn, and sometimes mineral but not always.
Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
