Answer:
observable
Explanation:
In order for an experiment to succesfully take place, the experiment must be controlated, observable, and repeatable, this means that under certain circumstances that you are able to control, you can observe an event and investigate it. It has to be observable in order to gain and gather information about the event and with this be able to come up with a conclusion of factor that make it possible and the consequences that the given event has.
After the September 11 terrorist attacks, Osama bin Laden argued that Al Qaeda was perfectly justified in killing all those people inside the World Trade Center because they weren't r:eally civilians–they were complicit in U.S. might and misdeeds. Didn't their taxes fund America's CIA assassinations and war planes? As every American understood perfectly well at the time, the attack that day would not have been justified even if all office workers in the Twin Towers had voted for a president and supported a military that perpetrated grave sins in the Middle East. Or even, indeed, if they were all subletting spare bedrooms to U.S. soldiers.
Killing civilians is wrong, no matter how often those who do it insist that the humans they killed weren't really innocent. Everyone understands this truth when the civilians being killed are one's countrymen or allies–but forget it quickly when the civilians are citizens of a country one is fighting or rooting against in war, even though the civilizational taboo against killing civilians becomes no less important.
use what you need
:)
The government stays out of affairs and lets the market mange itself. In this vien, Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” is the idea that there is an invisible force or hand that drives and manages the economy. People who subscribe to this form of economic thought usually favor small government intervention...they think the market will take care of itself and doesn’t need government subsidies, regulation, etc.
The financial strain of servicing old debt and the excesses of the current royal court caused<span> dissatisfaction with the monarchy, contributed to national unrest, and culminated in the </span>French Revolution<span> of 1789.</span>
