Answer:
If a firm has a debt ratio of 54%, then the firm's debt to equity ratio is 117%
Explanation:
The Debt Ratio is obtained dividing Liabilities / Assets. Then, a result of 54% means that 54% of the asset is composed by liabilities.
<u>Liabilities</u><u> 54 </u>
Assets 100
Debt Ratio= 54%
By the general accounting formula we know that
Assets= Liabilities+Equity. Then,
Assets(100)=Liabilities(54)+Equity(46)
If the Debt to equity ratio is calculated by the division of liabilities/Equity- Then:
<u>Liabilities 54</u>
Equity 46
Debt to Equity Ratio = 117%
This means that for 1 dollar on the Equity the company has 1 dollar plus 17% or 17 cents on the Liabilities.
Answer:
$2,264.04
Explanation:
To find future value we use the formula:
Future Value = Annual payment × Future value annuity factor
Therefore,
![FV = P * [((1+r)^n - 1) / r]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20FV%20%3D%20P%20%2A%20%5B%28%281%2Br%29%5En%20-%201%29%20%2F%20r%5D%20)
Where P = Principal amount = $180
r = rate = 5% == 0.05
n = 10 years
![= 180 *[((1+0.05)^1^0) / 0.05]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%3D%20180%20%2A%5B%28%281%2B0.05%29%5E1%5E0%29%20%2F%200.05%5D%20)

= $2,264.04
Therefore the Future Value is $2,264.04
Answer:
Is my approach professional and beneficial for the company?
Explanation:
Marla is facing an ethical dilemma best known as bias. As she has a personal relationship with Josh and has known him for a while now, she can't be purely objective when it comes to evaluating his performance. Even though she's pretty aware that his performance hasn't been up to the level required, their friendship might raise issues of value judgments. As her friend's supervisor, she needs to be as impartial, fair, transparent, and honest as possible. Her way to handle this situation will define her trustworthiness and loyalty towards the company and the other employees she's supervising.
Answer: The correct answer is "b. lose because Kelly had no legal duty to rescue him."
Explanation: Bob will lose because Kelly had no legal duty to rescue him,
While Kelly could have had a better attitude and at least tried to save him, she had no obligation to rescue him from the position he was in because of himself since Bob ignored the warning signs.