Answer:
both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50
Explanation:
Sue's production possibilities frontier:
Sue's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 70/21 = 3.33 caps
Tessa's production possibilities frontier:
Tessa's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 50/25 = 2 caps
Sue should produce caps and Tessa jackets:
total production = 70 caps (Sue) + 25 jackets (Tessa), if they trade they will both win because each specialized in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage (lower opportunity costs). If Sue traded and received 21 jackets, she would still have 28 caps left. If Tessa traded and received 50 caps, she would still have 10 jackets left.
Answer: Marginal cost under demand and supply theory. Answer is 80
Explanation: QD 100-4P, Marginal Cost =S4,QS =6P -20. So
the calculation goes thus = QS=6p-20
Inputing Marginal value of 4 equates 100-4(4)
100-16 = 84
QS=6(4)-4
24-20=4
profit maximisation =QD-QS
84-4=80
Answer:
<em>Consider the assets (in millions) of two banks, A and B. Both banks are funded by $120 million in deposits and $20 million in equity. Which bank has the stronger liquidity position? Which bank probably has a higher profit?</em>
<em>Consider the assets (in millions) of two banks, A and B. Both banks are funded by $120 million in deposits and $20 million in equity. Which bank has the stronger liquidity position? Which bank probably has a higher profit?Bank A Asset</em>
<em>Consider the assets (in millions) of two banks, A and B. Both banks are funded by $120 million in deposits and $20 million in equity. Which bank has the stronger liquidity position? Which bank probably has a higher profit?Bank A AssetBank B Assets</em>
Explanation:
<em>Liquid assets are those assets which get converted immediately into cash, when the company need some cash in hand, they can sell the liquid assets in the market and get cash in hand. As they can sell their various securities to fulfill the need of cash.</em>
<h3>
<em>HOPE</em><em> </em><em>THIS</em><em> </em><em>HELPS</em><em> </em><em>YOU</em><em> </em><em>ALOT</em><em>!</em></h3>
Answer: Athletes and entertainers must be very careful to think before they tweet or post anything to other social media sites. Because of the immediacy of this type of interaction and the high visibility of celebrities, one social media post could cause a whole lot of damage. Many celebrities have found this out firsthand. Take, for example, the case of Mark Cuban, owner of the NBA Dallas Mavericks. After his team got beat, he used his Twitter account to let off some steam at the referees who apparently—he thought—made some bad calls. His public venting cost him $25,000 in fines from the NBA. When he was notified about the fine, Cuban again used Twitter to vent, posting the following tweet on his profile: “can’t say no one makes money from twitter now. the nba does.”
Explanation: