Answer:
D
Explanation:
Considering the status of the person involved in the scandal and the journalist does not want to damage the image of the person involved, such information is considered on deep background and utilized without attribution.
Answer:
1. If you're walking somewhere, walk on the RIGHT side, NOT the left (If you're American :) If you're not American and it's normal for you to drive on the left side, then please also walk on the left side)
2. Don't chuck your trash at the tree. If you have trash, put it in a trashcan. If you see trash, put it in a trashcan.
3. If you're going to use profanity, do it quietly, please. It makes the rest of us uncomfortable.
4. When wearing earbuds or headphones, make sure that other peeps can't hear it.
5. SUPER SIMPLE but SOME brains can't get this: just be overall respectful to others. You don't know them or their situation, so leave them be.
6. Last one and it's small. Hold open doors for people right behind you. Don't pull a sneaky ninja right before the door closes and make the other person open the door.
Answer:
there is great wall of china but it is not one is seprated in about more than 10 parts.
THANKS
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
