1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murrr4er [49]
3 years ago
13

The three tracks in civil law​

Law
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
3 0
The three-track system (mainly of relevance to contract (and tort claims) in the County Court and the High Court) On receipt of a claim, the court will allocate the case to one of three tracks for the. hearing. The County Court hears all cases allocated to the small claims track, the majority of.
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ME QUICK!!!
maks197457 [2]

Source—common, Type—civil

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which type of breaching is the least used?
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

I think it's 2 not for sure

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.

Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide

3 0
3 years ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Some police officers want to search Ryan's private property because they suspect him of hiding criminal evidence. However, they
Margarita [4]
A. Amendment 4 because it’s “freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures” pretty much police officers aren’t allowed to look into someone’s property without a warrant. Hope that helps :P
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination mean?a. That a person only has to be a witness against him
    8·2 answers
  • What did Columbus's 1st and 4th voyages have in common?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of foreign policy? A. passing new taxes on goods shipped between states
    13·1 answer
  • If a plaintiff brings a civil lawsuit against a defendant for breach of contract or fraud, what burden of proof appliesPreponder
    7·1 answer
  • Should I get a 700 dollar tower that has an I5 gen 10 processor or should I get robux lol
    11·2 answers
  • What method is most commonly used in
    11·1 answer
  • This passage MOST accurately reflects the democratic ideals taken from
    5·2 answers
  • What are the four items you identified that would be included in an Incident Action Plan? What is the first action you would tak
    6·1 answer
  • Ipaliwanag ang consummated? ​
    15·1 answer
  • A proposal is also known as
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!